TAP Oscillators: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ Sep-21, 2022] | | [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ADDWmHf787E9skbWpd3ZCfuHsbptf4W8/view?usp=sharing Sep-21, 2022] | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ Aug-24, 2022] | | [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OooOkd_Dwrg0yCwhjlY0xMeqSsmy9Y8A/view?usp=sharing Aug-24, 2022] | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ Jun-29, 2022] | | [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JR--ArSWvf99No4swK--1zhNUN1yy7u2/view?usp=sharing Jun-29, 2022] | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 12 October 2022
Workstream #4
Objective
- Implementors needing to select oscillators for synchronizing networks in data centers face several challenges. Synchronization is a system-level requirement that is unclear how to satisfy by reading an oscillator datasheet. This makes it difficult and time consuming to select oscillators, leading to inconsistent and unpredictable PTP performance in the network. Therefore, the goal of this workstream is to specify classes of oscillators for common data center use cases to make it easier and faster to compare and select oscillators with high confidence to achieve a given level of PTP performance.
Project Team
- - Lead: Gary Giust (SiTime)